The Hard Truth About Energy & Global Transition
With Trump’s victory, the world has been given a stark reminder of our energy realities and the Illusion of a Global Transition.
Donald Trump has sent ripples through the global energy arena after becoming the 47th President of the United States. With his administration once again withdrawing from the Paris Agreement, the signal is clear: climate commitments that have long been central to international policy are taking a back seat to energy security and economic pragmatism. While many herald the energy transition as inevitable, Trump’s return challenges the notion that the shift away from fossil fuels is truly underway.
Trump’s decision to exit the Paris framework was not an impulsive policy reversal but a calculated move based on his administration’s belief that environmental regulations hinder domestic energy production and American competitiveness. Deregulation is framed as a tool to restore economic vitality, particularly in the fossil fuel sector. Yet, this decision has far-reaching implications beyond U.S. borders, especially regarding global energy strategies and corporate decarbonisation plans.
Where the World Stands on Renewables
At the heart of this debate lies the global energy mix—a reflection of how economies are powered today. The Energy Institute’s latest Statistical Review of World Energy offers a sobering perspective. In 2023, fossil fuels accounted for roughly 80% of the global energy mix, with renewables contributing around 12% and nuclear energy making up the remaining 8%. Despite advances in solar, wind, and other renewables, the world remains overwhelmingly reliant on oil, natural gas, and coal.
Nick Wayth, CEO of the Energy Institute, recently remarked: “Despite the considerable hype around renewable technologies, the energy transition has not begun.” While headlines are filled with ambitious decarbonisation pledges, the reality is that entrenched infrastructure, the economics of existing fuels, and the scale of global demand all slow the transition away from fossil fuels.
The Corporate Conundrum: Operational Advantage vs. Long-Term Energy Needs
Businesses have spent the past decade integrating decarbonisation into their long-term strategies, investing in renewables, energy efficiency, and carbon offset programs. These initiatives are not just about environmental responsibility; they are driven by investor expectations and competitive positioning. In theory, a shift toward clean energy reduces emissions while fostering innovation and cost savings.
However, Trump’s renewed focus on fossil fuels introduces fresh uncertainty. Companies that have made significant investments in decarbonisation must now navigate a landscape where deregulated fossil fuel production offers immediate stability, while long-term global trends push toward cleaner energy. This creates a dilemma: embrace short-term cost advantages from traditional fuels or stay the course on renewables, despite policy reversals in major economies like the U.S.
For energy-intensive industries, this shift is particularly significant. Manufacturers and heavy industries, long challenged by the intermittency and upfront costs of renewables, may find temporary relief in a pro-fossil-fuel environment. However, the risk remains that doubling down on traditional energy sources could leave them vulnerable as global markets continue moving toward lower-carbon solutions. Businesses must now balance immediate operational needs with the uncertainty of long-term energy trends.
Where Do We Go From Here?
Fossil fuels continue to underpin the majority of global energy consumption, and a rapid transition remains unlikely given the inertia of existing energy systems. Trump’s policies reflect a realist approach—one that prioritises supply, demand, and infrastructure over ideological aspirations.
For businesses, the challenge is to reconcile these conflicting pressures. In a policy environment marked by shifts between aggressive decarbonisation and renewed fossil fuel expansion, strategic flexibility is crucial. Companies must build decarbonisation plans that can withstand policy swings while adapting to evolving global trends and by taking a pragmatic approach.
Ultimately, the global energy landscape is at a crossroads. A measured, adaptable strategy will be key to navigating the uncertainties that lie ahead.
ESG360 integrates cutting-edge AI technology with expert-led support to automate and optimize ESG data collection, governance, and reporting. This combination reduces manual work, improves accuracy, and ensures readiness for evolving regulations, all while enabling businesses to create value from their ESG initiatives.
